top of page

$849 Million to Revamp Western Water Infrastructure Amid Climate Challenges... and a Surprising Lack of Flying Fish


an in doors water treatment plant.
Water Treatment Plant, Perfect breeding ground for said "flying fish."

WASHINGTON D.C. – In a move that has left environmentalists scratching their heads and desert lizards utterly bewildered, the US Department of the Interior recently announced a groundbreaking $849 million investment to modernize water infrastructure across 11 Western states. This funding, part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), aims to address the mounting challenges of aging systems, climate change, and a historic megadrought gripping the region.


“This is a monumental undertaking,” declared a visibly damp Acting Deputy Secretary Laura Daniel-Davis, who appeared to be sweating profusely despite the air-conditioned briefing room. “We are talking about revitalizing the lifeblood of the West, ensuring that our communities have access to clean, reliable water in the face of unprecedented challenges.”


Western Water Infrastructure

However, the announcement was met with a surprising lack of enthusiasm.

“$849 million? That’s it?” scoffed Mildred “Midge” McTavish, a seasoned environmental activist who has been known to chain herself to redwood trees and a trucker named "Dan". “We’re talking about a region ravaged by drought, facing the existential threat of water scarcity. And the best they can come up with is a measly $849 million? This is an insult to the parched earth, a slap in the face to the thirsty desert tortoise!”


Concerns were also raised about the lack of innovative solutions.

“Where are the flying fish?” demanded Dr. Bartholomew “Bart” Higgins, a renowned hydrologist with a penchant for the outlandish. “Why aren’t we investing in cloud seeding technology? Why aren’t we exploring the possibility of underwater kelp farms to desalinate the ocean? This plan is unimaginative, my friends. It’s like trying to put out a forest fire with a garden hose.”

The focus on “repairs” and “upgrades” also drew criticism.


the cute photo of a desert fox who has large existential pronouncements.
Ferdinand, Saudi Arabian Desert Fox.

“You’re not just dealing with aging infrastructure,” lamented Ferdinand, a particularly articulate Saudi Arabian desert fox with a fondness for existential pronouncements. "We’re dealing with a climate crisis. We need radical solutions, not Band-Aids. Where are the plans for underground aquifers? For massive, continent-spanning water-sharing networks? For a fleet of water-carrying drones? For large scorpion and rodent farms?" Ferdinand went on to say, Sometimes, I look up at the stars and I wonder... what is the meaning of all this scurrying? Are we truly free, or are we merely grains of sand, blown about by the whims of the wind, destined to be swallowed by the ever-shifting dunes of time?"


Government Comments:

Western Water Infrastructure: The Department of the Interior, however, remained unfazed by the criticism.

“These are significant investments,” reiterated Daniel-Davis, mopping her brow. “They will address critical needs, improve water efficiency, and enhance the resilience of our communities. And besides,” she added with a mischievous glint in her eye, “who wouldn’t want to see a fleet of water-carrying drones? That would be quite a sight.”


The announcement also sparked heated debate within the scientific community.

“This is a missed opportunity,” lamented Dr. Beatrice “Bea” McTavish, a renowned hydrologist who has a particular aversion to politicians. "They should be investing in research and development, exploring cutting-edge technologies like… well, I’m still working on that part. But I’m sure something brilliant will come to me.”


Despite the mixed reactions, one thing is certain: the future of water in the West remains uncertain. As the drought intensifies and the climate continues to change, the pressure on policymakers to find innovative and sustainable solutions will only increase.


Note: The opinions and quotes attributed to Ferdinand the desert fox should not be taken as an accurate representation of all desert fox sentiment.


Sources:



Commentaires


Insert Email Address. Receive Email. No Eye Contact.

© 2035 by Hard Hat Kings. Please help us share the news.

bottom of page